Recent Posts
1
Web Server - Ask For Help / Re: GPF on Line=1774 Proc=SSL_OUR_SERVERSWITCHTOSSL
« Last post by JohanR on June 05, 2026, 10:36:33 PM »Hi,
Found it!
thanks
Johan
Found it!
thanks
Johan
2
Web Server - Ask For Help / Re: GPF on Line=1774 Proc=SSL_OUR_SERVERSWITCHTOSSL
« Last post by JohanR on June 05, 2026, 08:50:29 AM »Hi Jorge
From the General extension, "Log files" tab, activated Force /netall
Is it possible to gibe more info on exactly where this is?
Think I zigged instead of zagged, can't find this setting
thanks
Johan
From the General extension, "Log files" tab, activated Force /netall
Is it possible to gibe more info on exactly where this is?
Think I zigged instead of zagged, can't find this setting
thanks
Johan
3
Web Server - Ask For Help / POST(Event:CloseWindow) by Timer embed in NT app
« Last post by Richard I on June 03, 2026, 02:39:13 AM »I have the need to close a running NT app by code
This is the code..
If CON:AutoClose =1
If Clock()> Man:Closetime and Con:lastClosedate < today()
Con:lastClosedate = today()
Access:Control Update()
POST(Event:Closewindow)
END
END
I can achieve the close window but the code is not updating from the Webserver's Timer Embed.
Is there an alternative embed that will run the code update and then close the window?
Thanks
Richard
NT 14.38
This is the code..
If CON:AutoClose =1
If Clock()> Man:Closetime and Con:lastClosedate < today()
Con:lastClosedate = today()
Access:Control Update()
POST(Event:Closewindow)
END
END
I can achieve the close window but the code is not updating from the Webserver's Timer Embed.
Is there an alternative embed that will run the code update and then close the window?
Thanks
Richard
NT 14.38
4
Web Server - Ask For Help / Is there a way to GET binary files from a rest server, not using encoding?
« Last post by jlavera on May 23, 2026, 05:21:58 PM »Hi, all.
We have some API Rest servers where the speed had become critical, so if we can reduce the traffic it would be great. We used to upload/download (POST, GET) files using base64 encoding inside json packages. It works great, but it adds 30% to 40% of overhead.
We replaced all the POST with Multipart/form-data, the API rest server recognizes it perfectly, and we receive those files way faster than before.
However, I don't find the way to do the same for GET operations; for what I see, the methods force to use either json or xml (the "default return format" is mandatory and either json or xml).
Is there a way to transmit a Multipart/form-data response? Or any other way to transmit binaries, for example BSON or even CBOR?
Cheers,
Jorge Lavera
We have some API Rest servers where the speed had become critical, so if we can reduce the traffic it would be great. We used to upload/download (POST, GET) files using base64 encoding inside json packages. It works great, but it adds 30% to 40% of overhead.
We replaced all the POST with Multipart/form-data, the API rest server recognizes it perfectly, and we receive those files way faster than before.
However, I don't find the way to do the same for GET operations; for what I see, the methods force to use either json or xml (the "default return format" is mandatory and either json or xml).
Is there a way to transmit a Multipart/form-data response? Or any other way to transmit binaries, for example BSON or even CBOR?
Cheers,
Jorge Lavera
5
Web Server - Ask For Help / Re: GPF on Line=1774 Proc=SSL_OUR_SERVERSWITCHTOSSL
« Last post by jlavera on May 22, 2026, 02:07:28 AM »For others and future references, the debug in NT was disabled, and when I activated it, the GPFs just stopped.
From the General extension, "Log files" tab, activated Force /netall, and the error went away - no more GPFs.
Bruce told me the debug change forces a "full recompile", and that's why it was fixed. As per his request, I recompiled again without the debug.
Indeed after 8 hours the GPFs still didn't return, so there's a magic trick to fix this.
Kind regards,
Jorge Lavera
From the General extension, "Log files" tab, activated Force /netall, and the error went away - no more GPFs.
Bruce told me the debug change forces a "full recompile", and that's why it was fixed. As per his request, I recompiled again without the debug.
Indeed after 8 hours the GPFs still didn't return, so there's a magic trick to fix this.
Kind regards,
Jorge Lavera
6
Web Server - Ask For Help / Re: Restrictok issue
« Last post by wasatchconsulting on May 21, 2026, 11:38:49 AM »Well that workaround worked. Same as you, I cannot figure out why it is returning restricted as I cannot figure out what it was looking at. Maybe CanCall is what needs to be reviewed.
Thanks for the workaround.
Ken
Thanks for the workaround.
Ken
7
Web Server - Ask For Help / Re: GPF on Line=1774 Proc=SSL_OUR_SERVERSWITCHTOSSL
« Last post by jlavera on May 21, 2026, 06:41:46 AM »Hi, Bruce.
You didn't teamviewer that time, we finally did an upgrade of NT to the latest NT 12.x and the error went away.
While the GPF is exactly the same, the situation is different this time. In that time the error was in a single server running alone, this is no longer happening. And we are in the latest of everything.
Kind regards,
Jorge Lavera
You didn't teamviewer that time, we finally did an upgrade of NT to the latest NT 12.x and the error went away.
While the GPF is exactly the same, the situation is different this time. In that time the error was in a single server running alone, this is no longer happening. And we are in the latest of everything.
Kind regards,
Jorge Lavera
8
Web Server - Ask For Help / Re: GPF on Line=1774 Proc=SSL_OUR_SERVERSWITCHTOSSL
« Last post by Bruce on May 21, 2026, 06:03:14 AM »probably not.
My guess is whatever you did wrong in 2022 you've done wrong again.
Since I had to TeamViewer in to see what that was last time, I'm guessing I need to do that again.
My guess is whatever you did wrong in 2022 you've done wrong again.
Since I had to TeamViewer in to see what that was last time, I'm guessing I need to do that again.
9
Web Server - Ask For Help / Re: Restrictok issue
« Last post by seanh on May 20, 2026, 03:41:03 PM »This similar to a situation I had with the logout menu item.
I added this code to webhander procedure in webhandler.p_web, restrictok method, Priority 3000
if pProcedure = 'SecwinLogoutWeb' !smh Hack to get logout ok
ReturnValue = sw:CanAccess
END
It's just after a call to SecwinCurrentUser.getRight
I could never trace why it was coming back restricted when I set everything otherwise.
I also have secwin set to deny by default, which I think was part of the problem.
I added this code to webhander procedure in webhandler.p_web, restrictok method, Priority 3000
if pProcedure = 'SecwinLogoutWeb' !smh Hack to get logout ok
ReturnValue = sw:CanAccess
END
It's just after a call to SecwinCurrentUser.getRight
I could never trace why it was coming back restricted when I set everything otherwise.
I also have secwin set to deny by default, which I think was part of the problem.
10
Web Server - Ask For Help / Restrictok issue
« Last post by wasatchconsulting on May 20, 2026, 11:00:22 AM »I am running NetTalk 14.37 and Secwin 7.6
I have a procedure that was generated called on a webserver project called SecWinLoginWeb. I have had no issues for years and then just recently, the login page stopped appearing on the main page. I can still just type in the procedure and the login page appears and I can login and move forward.
I set some trace up and everything is just fine with GetSessionLoggedIn() and CanCall(), but RestrictOk() is giving a response of "1" and not "0" and so the button does not appear. All other buttons appear without any issues with the logic used.
I tried even bringing in a login page from another application just to see if there is something about the procedure, but there is something else that is giving the wrong response. I don't see any clues as to what RestrictOK() is looking at and the documentation does not mention this procedure.
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated
Ken Watts
I have a procedure that was generated called on a webserver project called SecWinLoginWeb. I have had no issues for years and then just recently, the login page stopped appearing on the main page. I can still just type in the procedure and the login page appears and I can login and move forward.
I set some trace up and everything is just fine with GetSessionLoggedIn() and CanCall(), but RestrictOk() is giving a response of "1" and not "0" and so the button does not appear. All other buttons appear without any issues with the logic used.
I tried even bringing in a login page from another application just to see if there is something about the procedure, but there is something else that is giving the wrong response. I don't see any clues as to what RestrictOK() is looking at and the documentation does not mention this procedure.
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated
Ken Watts