NetTalk Central

NetTalk Web Server => Web Server - Ask For Help => Topic started by: Matthew51 on January 06, 2022, 03:36:52 PM

Title: Min height no longer wooks for wizards
Post by: Matthew51 on January 06, 2022, 03:36:52 PM
NT 12.33

The min height option looks like it no longer works for wizards. I have a wizard with a min height of 200, but the height gets set to 168.467 and elements are overlapping with the navigation buttons. Presumably this is done by java script. I used the inspector in Firefox to comment out the height and everything worked fine. Could it also be an option to let the browser determine the height?

Thank you
Matthew
Title: Re: Min height no longer wooks for wizards
Post by: Bruce on January 10, 2022, 11:07:17 PM
Hi Matthew,

It absolutely is an option to set the height specifically - just set it in your css.

That said, In recent builds there were updates to this JavaScript code, and it should be working correctly.
As long as your setting is a number (ie, no px or whatever unit) and as long as all the controls are on the form in the normal way (ie nothing being created in hand-code) it should work.

So if you have a wizard that is not working, please duplicate the issue in an example app and post it to me please.

Cheers
Bruce
Title: Re: Min height no longer wooks for wizards
Post by: Matthew51 on January 11, 2022, 04:14:24 PM
Hi Bruce

I modified example 1 to show off the problem. If you chance Forward Only on tab 2 to yes a large text field will be un-hidden and is overlapping with the buttons. I set the min height to 500 which is more then enough, but the size is still only 222.8 if Forward Only is 'No' then the form is created. I think 12.27 was the version I was on prior and it was working.

Thank you
Matthew
Title: Re: Min height no longer wooks for wizards
Post by: Matthew51 on January 11, 2022, 04:15:45 PM
I tried to zip up the whole folder, but the forum wouldn't let me upload it. I tried a 15mb file and 4mb, nether worked.
Title: Re: Min height no longer wooks for wizards
Post by: Bruce on January 12, 2022, 04:09:12 AM
thanks for the example, fixed for 12.34

Cheers
Bruce